USPTO serial 78491152
AQUAKLEEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AQUAKLEEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Clear Island Waters, Queensland, AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, appliances and devices for cleaning ponds and swimming pools, namely automatic underwater pool cleaners; electrical, electronic, automatic machines and appliances for cleaning ponds and swimming pools, namely automatic underwater pool cleaners; industrial robots for cleaning ponds and swimming pools, and parts therefor; systems comprised of automatic underwater pool cleaners component parts, and machines for filtering water contained in ponds and swimming pools, and parts therefor; filters, namely pond and swimming pool water cleaning filters; cartridges for filtering machines, pond and swimming pool water cleaning filters; pumps for ponds in the nature of water pumps for swimming pools; pumps as components for machines, namely pond and swimming pool water pumps; hand-held vacuum cleaners for cleaning swimming pools; machines and apparatuses in the nature of industrial robots for washing swimming pools; automatic swimming pool cleaners, namely automatic underwater pool cleaners; automatic machines for cleaning swimming pools, namely, electric machines for cleaning swimming pools and parts of these machines namely, engine blocks, transmission cases, brush holders and brushes, hoods, float grips, filter holder plates and filter bags; machines and equipment, namely, pond and swimming pool water pumps; filtering machines, namely pond and swimming pool water cleaning filters and filters for machines or engines; water sanitation devices, namely pond and swimming pool water sanitation devices; pool cleaners, namely automatic underwater pool cleaners; and parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2007 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 15, 2007 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 31, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |