USPTO serial 78494623
COMPLIANCE PARTNER VRFID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3419828Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 29, 2008
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMPLIANCE PARTNER VRFID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Miles Technologies, Incorporated
Lake Zurich, IL
Miles Technologies, Incorporated
Lake Zurich, IL
Miles Technologies, Incorporated
Lake Zurich, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and programs for use in printing, coordinating, associating and tracking unique serial numbers of RFID labels, to product identification numbers, carton numbers and pallet numbers on which they are shipped to customers by purchase order and such software and programs that also perform information exchange functions with other programs and devices to acquire open purchase order information, issue shipment confirmation information, print labels, validate encoded RFID label data, perform RFID label interrogation and tracking of RFID label electronic characteristics, check RFID label readability by performing a signal strength test, perform exception handling routines, Barcode, pallet assembly process and stores audit trails of all the data with current and history query functions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 20, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Miles Technologies, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Miles Technologies, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Miles Technologies, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named COMPLIANCE PARTNER VRFID
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |