USPTO serial 78494824
HR 1837
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3972535Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2011
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HR 1837?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail department store services featuring men's and women's clothing, footwear, home accessories, handbags, watches, small leather goods, luggage, linen and blankets, tableware, giftware, furniture, flatware, toys and novelty items, infant's clothing and accessories, stationery, cosmetics, fragrances and jewelry; retail fur stores; mail order services featuring men's and women's clothing, footwear, home accessories, handbags, watches, small leather goods, luggage, linen and blankets, tableware, giftware, furniture, flatware, toys and novelty items, infant's clothing and accessories, stationery, cosmetics, fragrances and jewelry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | [ Credit card services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | [ Fur and outerwear cleaning services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Fur and outerwear storage services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Bar and restaurant services; catering services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Health spa services, namely, cosmetic body care services; manicure services; hairdressing salons; personal grooming and makeup consultation services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Personal shopping services for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Holt Renfrew & Co., Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Holt Renfrew & Co., Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Holt Renfrew & Co., Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named HR 1837
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 7, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2011 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 3, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |