Drawing for MESA

USPTO serial 78495253

MESA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MILLER, DAVID S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MESA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Bathroom accessories, namely towel bars, towel rings, tissue holders and tumbler-toothbrush holdersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Sep 5, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Aug 29, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Feb 20, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 7, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 7, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 21, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jul 27, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jul 27, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jun 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 6, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 31, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Apr 26, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 26, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 26, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance