USPTO serial 78497535
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic audio recording system composed of recorded musical sounds and natural sounds, DVD players, computer software for processing digital music files, computer hardware and audio speakers all for capturing musical and natural sounds, electronically storing them on a programmable computer based playback system and for playing back of therapeutic sounds | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | audio recording and production services for therapeutic sounds | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |