Drawing for ADVANCED INTIMATE FEMININE CARE

USPTO serial 78497542

ADVANCED INTIMATE FEMININE CARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADVANCED INTIMATE FEMININE CARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rene M. LaForte

RENE M LAFORTE THOMPSON HINE LLP2000 COURTHOUSE PLZ NE 10 W 2NDDAYTON, OH 45402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Body sprays; Body Powders; Body washes; Feminine deodorant sprays; Shaving creams, gels, and lotions; Face and body creams and lotions; Non-medicated douches; and Non-medicated pre-moistened wipes for personal hygiene.ACTIVE
005Feminine hygiene products, namely, topical creams, lotions, and gels for the treatment and relief of yeast infections, medicated douches, medicated powders and skin creams, personal lubricants, vaginal lubricants and suppositories; Feminine hygiene cleansing towelettes; Vaginal washes; Vaginal moisturizers; and Medicated pre-moistened towelettesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 28, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 28, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 14, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 28, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 19, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Oct 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance