Drawing for JAGUAR NICKEL

USPTO serial 78498242

JAGUAR NICKEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JAGUAR NICKEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006(Based on Intent to Use) Base metals and refined ores from which base metals may be obtained, namely, iron ores, nickel ores, zinc ores, lead ores and copper oresACTIVE
014(Based on Intent to Use) Precious metals and their alloys for manufacturing and industrial useACTIVE
035(Based on Intent to Use and 44(e)) Business marketing, business planning and business administration services, all in the precious and base metals industriesACTIVE
037(Based on Intent to Use) Mining extractionACTIVE
040(Based on Intent to Use) Material treatment and processing of mineral ores and concentratesACTIVE
042(Based on Intent to Use and 44(e)) Mining exploration services; engineering and designing of mining sites and plants to treat ores for others in the field of precious and base metal industriesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 21, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Apr 4, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Mar 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 22, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 22, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 21, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 21, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 20, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 20, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance