USPTO serial 78498488
MULTICHANNEL MERCHANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3131377Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 15, 2006
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MULTICHANNEL MERCHANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PRIMEDIA Business Magazines & Media, Inc.
Overland Park, KS
Other trademarks owned by PRIMEDIA Business Magazines & Media, Inc.
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
ROCKVILLE, MD
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PERIODIC MAGAZINE ABOUT MARKETING FOR PUBLISHERS, PRODUCERS, AND DESIGNERS OF PRINT CATALOGS AND E-COMMERCE WEBSITES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | PROVIDING BUSINESS INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING INFORMATION ON BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES AND MARKETING DIRECTED TO PUBLISHERS, PRODUCERS, AND DESIGNERS OF PRINT CATALOGS AND E-COMMERCE WEBSITES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING ONLINE INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION FORUMS FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING BUSINESS INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF MARKETING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRIMEDIA Business Magazines & Media, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PRISM BUSINESS MEDIA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PRISM BUSINESS MEDIA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PENTON BUSINESS MEDIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ACCESS INTELLIGENCE LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named MULTICHANNEL MERCHANT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |