USPTO serial 78498515
U3
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with U3?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Brody-Brown
DANA BRODY-BROWN WHITE & CASE LLP3000 EL CAMINO REAL5 PALO ALTO SQ 9TH FLPALO ALTO, CA 94306Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, USB OPERATING SOFTWARE, COMPUTER OPERATING PROGRAMS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS, OPERATING SYSTEM PROGRAMS, GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE SOFTWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE ADAPTATION OF THE SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS OF OTHERS TO PERMIT OPERABILITY FROM A USB FLASH DRIVE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO ENABLE COMPUTER HARDWARE MANUFACTURERS TO CREATE STANDARDS COMPLIANT USB FLASH DRIVES THAT PERMIT DEPLOYMENT OF SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS FROM USB FLASH DRIVES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE PLATFORMS FOR THE STORAGE AND OPERATION OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS ON USB FLASH DRIVES; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER MEMORY DEVICES, NAMELY, USB FLASH DRIVES, MEMORY EXPANSION MODULES, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT CARDS AND CARTRIDGES, AND OTHER SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES, NAMELY, FLASH MEMORY CARDS, CARTRIDGES, ADAPTERS, CONVERTERS, CONTROLLERS, STORAGE MODULES AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTER OPERATING PROGRAMS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICES AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |