USPTO serial 78498842
GLAMOUR PUSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLAMOUR PUSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | CAT SCRATCHING POSTS, CAT SCRATCHING MATS, CAT CARRIERS, CAT COLLARS, CAT HARNESSES, LEATHER OR IMITATION LEATHER CAT TAGS, CAT LEASHES; HANDBAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, EVENING BAGS, COSMETIC BAGS SOLD EMPTY, COSMETIC CASES SOLD EMPTY, COSMETIC POUCHES SOLD EMPTY, GROOMING KITS SOLD EMPTY, LEATHER SHOULDER BELTS FOR BAGS AND WALLETS, CREDIT CARD CASES, BUSINESS CARD CASES, KEY CASES, PASSPORT CASES, COIN PURSES, CARRY-ALL CLUTCHES, GENERAL PURPOSE PURSES, DRAWSTRING POUCHES, BOOK BAGS, LEATHER AND TEXTILE SHOPPING BAGS SOLD EMPTY, TOTE BAGS, TRAVEL BAGS, OVERNIGHT BAGS, ALL-PURPOSE ATHLETIC BAGS, CARRY-ON BAGS, GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL, DUFFEL BAGS, GYM BAGS, BEACH BAGS, FANNY PACKS, BACKPACKS, KNAPSACKS, UMBRELLAS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | CAT LITTER BOXES, CAT LITTER SCOOPS, CAT LITTER SCOOP HOLDERS, CAT FOOD BOWLS, CAT FOOD HOLDERS, CAT WATER BOWLS, CAT FEEDERS, ANIMAL ACTIVATED WATERERS FOR CATS, CAT FOOD SCOOPS, CAT BRUSHES, CAT COMBS, CAT HAIR LIFTERS, CAT HAIR ROLLERS, CAT TOOTHBRUSHES, CAT GROOMING TOOL HOLDERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |