USPTO serial 78498997
RAISON D'ÊTRE, LINEN IS MY LUXURY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3298852Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2007
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RAISON D'ÊTRE, LINEN IS MY LUXURY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
UGURTEKS Tekstil Ürünleri Ticaret ve Sanayi Anonim Sirketi
Güngören, INSTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by UGURTEKS Tekstil Ürünleri Ticaret ve Sanayi Anonim Sirketi
UGURTEKS Tekstil Ürünleri Ticaret ve Sanayi Anonim Sirketi
Güngören, INSTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by UGURTEKS Tekstil Ürünleri Ticaret ve Sanayi Anonim Sirketi
UGURTEKS Tekstil Ürünleri Ticaret ve Sanayi Anonim Sirketi
Güngören, INSTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by UGURTEKS Tekstil Ürünleri Ticaret ve Sanayi Anonim Sirketi
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing for men, women and children, namely, pants, jeans, jackets, shirts, shorts, tops, coats, skirts, vests, dresses and blouses, sport clothes namely, sweat pants, shorts, sweatshirts, t-shirts, tops, woven pants, woven shirts, woven jackets, knit tops, sweaters, coats, skirts, denim, denim pants, vests, knit, dresses, cardigans and blouses made in whole or in significant part of linen | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 026 | Laces for clothing, embroidery for clothing, fabric appliqués for clothing, ribbons for clothing, braids for clothing, cloth patches, namely, letters and numbers for clothing, all made in whole or in significant part of linen | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UGURTEKS Tekstil Ürünleri Ticaret ve Sanayi Anonim Sirketi
- Other trademarks owned by UGURTEKS Tekstil Ürünleri Ticaret ve Sanayi Anonim Sirketi
- Other trademarks owned by UGURTEKS Tekstil Ürünleri Ticaret ve Sanayi Anonim Sirketi
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named RAISON D'ÊTRE, LINEN IS MY LUXURY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |