USPTO serial 78499056
Serial No. 78499056
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURNS, ELLEN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78499056?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, or vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee; coffee extracts; coffee-based preparations and beverages; iced coffee; coffee substitutes; extracts of coffee substitutes; nonalcoholic and noncarbonated preparations and beverages based on coffee substitutes; chicory; tea; tea extracts; non-alcoholic beverages made with tea; iced tea; malt extracts for food and malt for food purposes; cocoa and cocoa-based preparations and beverages; chocolate; confectionery, namely, candies and toffees, not for medicinal purposes; sugar; chewing gum; natural sweeteners; bakery products; bread; yeast; pastry; biscuits; cakes; cookies; wafers; puddings; ice cream; water ices; sherbets; frozen confections; frozen cakes; soft ices and frozen yogurts; mixes for making the aforementioned ice cream, water ices, sherbets, frozen confections, frozen cakes, soft ices and frozen yogurts; frozen desserts, namely, ice milk and fruit ices and mixes for making ice milk and fruit ices; honey and honey substitutes; muesli; cereal bars; rice; pasta; noodles; prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta, noodles, grain, or rice; pizzas; sandwiches; mixtures of alimentary paste and oven-ready prepared dough; sauces; soya sauce; ketchup; aromatising or seasoning products for food, edible spices, salad dressings, mayonnaise; mustard; vinegar | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |