USPTO serial 78499628
BOOTY CALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOOTY CALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick W. Meyers
FREDERICK W. MEYERS LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1200CHICAGO, IL 60604-2592UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing online forms for the transmission, recordal and storage of messages among computer users for dating, friendship or social purposes via a global computer network; providing a forum for the transmission, recordal and storage of electronic voice messages for dating, friendship or social purposes, via telephone | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |