USPTO serial 78500506
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Beverly Hills, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | (Based on Intent to Use) dietary supplements and diet aids, namely vitamins and mineral supplements; nutritional drinks; meal replacement protein bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | pre-recorded video tapes and cassettes, DVDs, CDs, featuring exercise, fitness and dietary information and instruction | ACTIVE | Dec 27, 2004 |
| 028 | (Based on Intent to Use) exercise equipment, namely, machines, stationary bicycles, benches, treadmills, tables, trampolines, chest pulls, chest expanders, abdominal boards, rowing machines, weights, bars, bands, and pulleys | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely physical fitness instruction and instruction in the fields of diet and exercise and printed materials used in connection therewith | ACTIVE | Dec 27, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |