USPTO serial 78500556
PLATELETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 10, 2009
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with PLATELETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aberdeen AB22 8GU, GB
Aberdeen AB22 8GU, GB
Aberdeen AB22 8GU, GB
MADISONVILLE, LA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T Regard
Joseph T Regard Joseph T Regard, Ltd plcPO Drawer 429Madisonville, LA 70447-0429UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [Seals of metal for pipes; seals of metal for preventing leakage of fluids; discrete sealing elements of metal, namely, seals for stopping leakage from pipes] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [Leak detection and testing apparatus, instruments and units for use on pipes and pipe seals, and other pressurized systems, namely, fluid filled ducts, oil and gas ducts, water ducts, and effluents ducts; electronic leak detection and testing apparatus, instruments and units for use on pipes and pipe seals, and other pressurized systems, namely, fluid filled ducts, oil and gas ducts, water ducts, and effluent ducts; sensing apparatus, namely, sensors for use to detect leaks; underground pipe locating apparatus, instruments and units for use on pipes and pipe seals, and other pressurized systems, namely, fluid filled ducts, oil and gas ducts, water ducts, and effluent ducts; pipeline inspection tools in the nature of pipe and seal defect detectors; ultrasonic detectors for pipeline inspection] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Sealants for pipes manufactured from polymer, rubber, plastic, and other non metal materials; discrete sealing elements made of polymer, rubber, plastic, and other non metal materials, namely, seals for locating and marking leakage from pipes and seals and other pressurized systems, namely, fluid filled ducts, oil and gas ducts, water ducts, and effluent ducts; discrete sealing elements made polymer, rubber, plastic, and other non metal materials, namely, seals for stopping leakage from pipes and seals, and other pressurized systems, namely, fluid filled ducts, oil and gas ducts, water ducts, and effluent ducts; polymers in the nature of seals for use in civil engineering; discrete sealing elements made of polymer, rubber, plastic, and other non metal materials, namely, seals containing [magnetic, radioactive, fluorescent, piezoelectric, colored, luminescent, thermal luminescent, infra-red, ultra-violet, electromagnetic,] temperature sensitive, chemical [or biological] labels, tags or markers for use to seal leaks on pipes and pipe seals, and other pressurized systems, namely, fluid filled ducts, oil and gas ducts, water ducts, and effluent ducts; discrete sealing elements made of polymer, rubber, plastic, and other non metal materials, namely, seals containing means of detection or sensing thereof for use to seal and detect leaks on pipes and pipe seals, and other pressurized systems, namely, fluid filled ducts, oil and gas ducts, water ducts, and effluent ducts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Brinker Technology Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Brinker Technology Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Brinker Technology Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by SEAL-TITE, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named PLATELETS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 29, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 26, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 14, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| May 3, 2008 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |