USPTO serial 78500591
CRAZY GIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRAZY GIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chatsworth, CA
Chatsworth, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN J. STRAUSS
STEPHEN J. STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTEN LLP6060 CENTER DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WOMEN'S LINGERIE, NAMELY, PANTIES, G-STRINGS, TANK TOPS AND CAMISOLES; AND KITS COMPRISED OF THE SAME | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |