USPTO serial 78500704
SIGMA ALIMENTOS USA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIGMA ALIMENTOS USA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN PEDRO GARZA GARCIA, NUEVO LEON, MX
SAN PEDRO GARZA GARCIA, NUEVO LEON, MX
Houston, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | applesauce, meats, seafood, poultry, sausage, processed nuts, bologna, soups, butter, stew, margarine, canned vegetables, canned fruit, canned beans, hamburger, canned cooked meat, cheese, chili, dips, jams, jellies, milk, cream cheese, eggs, frozen prepared and fresh prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables, potato chips, food package combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat and/or processed fruit, hot dogs, frozen vegetables, frozen fruit, French fried potatoes, luncheon meats, guacamole, sour cream, whipped cream, yogurt, fruit-based snack foods, instant potatoes, peanut butter, processed vegetables and fruits, cooking oils, vegetable oils and olive oils, protein and soy protein for use as a food additive | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | salsa, pasta, noodles, rice, bread, bakery goods, baking powder, granola-based snack bars, flour, coffee, tea, breakfast cereals, flavoring extracts, burritos, mixes for bakery goods, candy, sauces, seasonings, chocolate, cocoa, honey, frostings, tortilla chips, crackers, pretzels, table syrup, spices, custards, empanada, enchiladas, packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice, fajitas, flavored ices, food flavorings, pizza, frozen confections, condiments, namely ketchup, mustard, relish, pot pies, popcorn, oatmeal, salad dressings, sandwiches, sugar, tacos, tamales, tortillas, vinegar and yeast, flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes, cocoa-based ingredient in confectionery products, and food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as an ingredient | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | live fish for food purposes, namely shellfish and fish, fresh fruits and fresh vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | beer, mineral and aerated waters, carbonated water and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, soft drinks, soda water, lemonades, sports drinks, caffeinated drink, namely soda pops, fruit drinks, fruit juices, vegetable juices and syrups for making fruit drinks and fruit juice concentrate | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail and wholesale grocery store services; wholesale distributorships featuring food products to the grocery store and retail trade not including the foodservice industry channel of trade; import and export agencies; and value added reseller services, namely, distributorships featuring commodities, namely raw materials, additives and ingredients for food products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SIGMA ALIMENTOS, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by SIGMA ALIMENTOS, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Sigma Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SIGMA ALIMENTOS USA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |