CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PEANUT MILK

USPTO serial 78500935

PEANUT MILK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3238467Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2007
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEANUT MILK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maureen Carroll

TRINITY PRODUCTS LLC30852 HUNTWOOD AVENUEHAYWARD, CA 94544UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Peanut based food beveragesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDMar 15, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2013C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jul 29, 2013CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 24, 2013CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Feb 5, 2013PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 22, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 1, 2007R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 16, 2007CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 7, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2006IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 15, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance