USPTO serial 78502485
THE HEALING BATH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3008089Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2005
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE HEALING BATH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stratford, ONTARIO, CA
Stratford, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath and Personal Care Products, namely, DEAD SEA BATH SALTS, BATH MELTS, namely, a moisturizing bath preparation made with a cocoa butter base, baking soda, citric acid and pure essential oils for personal use, BATH BOMBS, ESSENTIAL OILS for personal use, Bath kit GIFT BASKETS containing DEAD SEA BATH SALTS, BATH MELTS, namely, a moisturizing bath preparation made with a cocoa butter base, baking soda, citric acid and pure essential oils for personal use, BATH BOMBS, ESSENTIAL OILS for personal use and novelty bath items, namely, loofah sponges, and nail brushes sold as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |