USPTO serial 78502919
EMBRIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMBRIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Hoke
ROBERT W HOKE SHUTTLEWORTH & INGERSOLL PLCPO BOX 2107CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52406-2107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MEAT; POULTRY; GAME FOOD; MEAT EXTRACTS; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; JAMS AND COMPOTES; EGGS; MILK; EDIBLE OILS AND FATS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | COFFEE; TEA; COCOA; SUGAR; RICE; TAPIOCA; SAGO AND ARTIFICIAL COFFEE; FLOUR; BREAD; PASTRY; FLAVORED ICES; HONEY; TREACLE; YEAST; BAKING-POWDER; SALT; MUSTARD; VINEGAR; SAUCES; SPICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | UNPROCESSED GRAINS FOR EATING; PLANT, FRUIT AND CROP SEEDS; FOODSTUFFS FOR ANIMALS; MALT FOR BREWING AND DISTILLING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Diamond V Mills, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by EMBRIA HEALTH SCIENCES, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by EMBRIA HEALTH SCIENCES, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named EMBRIA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |