USPTO serial 78503026
ECITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Huntsville, AL
Huntsville, AL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angela Holt
Angela Holt LANIER FORD SHAVER & PAYNE, P.C.200 WESTSIDE SQUARESUITE 5000HUNTSVILLE, AL 35801-4863Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in facilities management in the fields of automated mapping and geographic information systems for municipal and governmental agencies, namely, electric utilities, gas utilities, water utilities, waste water utilities, telephone communication entities, cable providers, police, fire, medical emergency, emergency management, and transportation | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 27, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |