USPTO serial 78503176
DIANA B.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIANA B.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | BATH CRYSTALS CONTAINING SUGAR, BATH SALTS, FOAMING BATH GEL CONTAINING SUGAR; BATH BEADS; BATH OIL; BATH MILK; SCENTED BATH PEARLS; SCENTED BATH SUGAR CRYSTALS; SCENTED BUBBLE BATH; SCENTED BATH OIL; SCENTED BATH SALT CRYSTALS; SCENTED BATH MILK; SCENTED BATH GEL CONTAINING SUGAR; SCENTED PETROLEUM JELLY FOR COSMETIC USE; SCENTED BODY CREME; SCENTED BODY OIL; SCENTED BAR SOAP; PERFUME; EAU DE TOILETTE; EAU DE PERFUME; SCENTED BODY GLITTER CREAMS; SCENTED BODY GLITTER GELS; SCENTED BODY GLITTER OIL; SCENTED BODY GLITTER LOTION; SCENTED BODY GLITTER POWDER; COMBINED SCENTED BODY GLITTER AND BODY SCRUB CONTAINING SUGAR; SCENTED BODY SPRAY; SCENTED LIP GLOSS; SCENTED LIPSTICK; SCENTED CHEEK COLOR; SCENTED MAKEUP PRODUCTS FOR THE BODY CONTAINING IRIDESCENT POWDER; SCENTED HAIR SHAMPOO; SCENTED HAIR CONDITIONER; SCENTED GLITTER HAIR LACQUERS, OILS, GELS, STYLING PREPARATIONS, TONIC, AND LOTIONS , CONTAINING IRIDESCENT POWDER; TALCUM POWDER; NON-MEDICATED SKINCARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, FACE MASK COSMETIC PADS, HYDRATING BUST GEL WRAPS, HYDRATING BUST GEL, PURIFYING BUST GEL WRAPS, PURIFYING BUST GEL, HYDRATING FOOT GEL MASKS, PURIFYING FOOT GEL MASKS, SCENTED HYDRATING FOOT GEL, PURIFYING FOOT GEL, HYDRATING HAND GEL MASKS, PURIFYING HAND GEL MASKS, CELLULITE REDUCTION GEL WRAPS, CELLULITE REDUCTION THIGH GEL, HYDRATING THIGH GEL, PURIFYING THIGH GEL, FACIAL CLEANSING GEL, NON-MEDICATED SERUM FOR USE ON FACE AND NECK, FACIAL HYDRATING EMULSION, FACIAL PURIFYING MASK, FACIAL HYDRATING MASK, FACIAL CLARIFYING MASK, COSMETIC KIT CASE CONTAINING ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING-- LIP GLOSS, EYE PENCIL, BLUSH, MASCARA, EYE SHADOW, LIP PENCIL, LIPSTICK, AND BROW PENCIL; BATH KIT CASE CONTAINING ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING-- FACE AND BODY SCRUB CONTAINING SUGAR, BATH GEL, BODY OIL, AND BODY CREAM; BATH KIT CASE CONTAINING ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING-- SCENTED BODY GLITTER SCRUB CONTAINING SUGAR, SCENTED BATH GEL CONTAINING SUGAR, FOAMING BATH GEL CONTAINING SUGAR, SCENTED BODY GLITTER SPRAY, SCENTED BODY GLITTER LOTION, AND SCENTED BODY GLITTER CREAM; SHAVING KIT CASES CONTAINING ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING-- AFTER SHAVE LOTION, SHAVING GEL, SCENTED BAR SOAP, BODY SCRUB CONTAINING SUGAR, AND AFTER SHAVE FRAGRANCE; AND BODY AND BEAUTY CARE PREPARATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |