Drawing for ABSOLUTE FAVORITE HYMNS

USPTO serial 78503646

ABSOLUTE FAVORITE HYMNS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ABSOLUTE FAVORITE HYMNS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sarah E. Zgliniec and Laura Storto

Sarah E. Zgliniec Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP1133 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009pre-recorded audio and audio-visual cassette tapes, DVD's, compact discs, CD-Roms and enhanced CD's, all featuring musicABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Apr 6, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Apr 6, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Apr 6, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Mar 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 30, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 19, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Oct 18, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 5, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 2, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 2, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 1, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 27, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 27, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance