Drawing for WHO'S YOUR DADDY

USPTO serial 78504053

WHO'S YOUR DADDY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHO'S YOUR DADDY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert C. Cogan

ROBERT P. COGAN THE NATH LAW GROUP112 S. WEST STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather key chainsACTIVE—
020Non-metal non-leather key chains; foot lockers, pillows and seat cushions; stadium seats; nonmetal money clips, non-metal key rings, non-metal key chains; picture frames; hand-held mirrors; roller shades for windows with suction cups; magazine caddies; plaques; soft sculpture wall decorations; non-metal reusable bottle caps; non-metal clips for tablecloths; hard plastic bobble-head figurines and plastic bobble-cap statues; decorative mobiles; decorative miniature stadium reproductions, namely, small plastic models of a stadium used for an international athletic event; steel furniture; chairs and stools; tables, folding sports seats and stools; footstools; clothes hangers and coat hangers; non-metal trophy cups; bean bag chairs; non-metal stands for holding and displaying various types of balls; plastic figurines; and wooden letter boxesACTIVE—
021Bottles sold empty made of plastic and glass; paper and plastic drinking cups and glasses; jugs; decorative and commemorative plates; dinnerware; figurines made of china, crystal, earthenware, glass, porcelain and terra cotta; mugs made of earthenware, glass and porcelain; lunch boxes and pails; paper plates; tankards not of precious metal; meal trays, wastepaper basketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 10, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 2, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 4, 2006WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2006WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 6, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 11, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance