USPTO serial 78506319
TA ZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4295967Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 26, 2013
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TA ZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cigli, TR
Cigli, TR
Cigli, TR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M. COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, PTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUEOSSINING, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Based on 44(e))(Based on Use in Commerce) Salt, vinegar, sauces, sauces for salads, tomato sauce; (Based on 44(e)) Prepared pasta entree, namely, a ravioli-like dish served with a yogurt condiment, homemade macaroni; bread, pitas, pizzas; biscuits, crackers, waffles, pastry, tarts, cakes; Turkish pastries, bakery desserts, namely, pudding, pudding with a caramel base, rice pudding, chocolate pudding, milk pudding, noah's pudding; candies; condiments for food, namely, ketchup, mayonnaise, mustard, lemon juice, spices; candy for food, Turkish delight, namely, a finely layered pastry filled with nuts and steeped in sorbet, halvah, frozen yoghurt, confectionery, namely, chocolate cake, chocolate, chocolate products, namely, chocolate chips, chocolate topping, chocolate fondue, products covered with chocolate or candy, namely, chocolate covered nuts, candy coated apples, confectionery for decorating Christmas trees | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Taris Zeytin Zeytinyagi Ve Yan Urunleri Sanayi Ic Ve Dis Ticaret Pazarlama Nakliye Ve Yayincilik A.S.
- Other trademarks owned by Taris Zeytin Zeytinyagi Ve Yan Urunleri Sanayi Ic Ve Dis Ticaret Pazarlama Nakliye Ve Yayincilik A.S.
- Other trademarks owned by Taris Zeytin Zeytinyagi Ve Yan Urunleri Sanayi Ic Ve Dis Ticaret Pazarlama Nakliye Ve Yayincilik A.S.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named TA ZE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2012 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2012 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | RGSU | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | 44EP | 44(e) PETITION - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |