Drawing for THE MOVING STANDARD

USPTO serial 78506360

THE MOVING STANDARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE MOVING STANDARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JENNIFER A VAN KIRK

JENNIFER A VAN KIRK LEWIS & ROCA LLP40 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1900PHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Mail processing, namely provision of mail, package and delivery scheduling; provision of mail and package tracking services including verification of delivery; provision of temporary address change notification servicesACTIVE
039Pickup, transportation and delivery of packages, letters, correspondence, remittances, publications, advertisements and parcels by various modes of transportation; packaging articles for transportation; rental of mail boxes; providing a database in the field of mail delivery; electronic storage of messages and dataACTIVE
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for purposes of updating and correcting mailing address information; testing, analysis and evaluation of the mailing and delivery products and services of others for the purpose of certificationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 22, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 22, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 7, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 31, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance