USPTO serial 78512846
EASY PEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EASY PEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
7418 AH DEVENTER (SCHIPHOL), NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEWIS F. GOULD, JR.
LEWIS F GOULD JR/ MAXIM A VOLTCHENKO DUANE MORRIS LLP30 S 17TH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Containers and cans, filled with pharmaceutical preparations, beverages, food and meals for medically restricted diets, baby food, all-purpose disinfectants, disinfectants for contact lenses, chemical toilets, general hygienic use, medical instruments and for sanitation purposes, herbicides, insecticides, pesticides and fungicides for home, garden, lawn and professional use | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Containers, cans and lids made primarily of metal; containers, cans and lids made primarily of metal for use with food, beverages, pharmaceuticals, paints and coatings, and chemical- technical contents | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Closures for containers, made primarily of cardboard or paper, plastic bags for packaging, plastic food storage bags for household use | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Containers, not of metal for commercial use; containers for industrial and commercial liquids not made of metal; non-metal closures for containers, plastic lids, plastic lids for cans, plastic caps; packing containers made primarily of plastic material, plastic containers, namely tubs for consumer products packaging, plastic boxes, storage containers for commercial or industrial use, made primarily of plastic, plastic storage drums | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Containers and cans, filled with meat, fish, poultry, game, meat extracts, prepared meals composed of meat and vegetables or meat or vegetables, cooked meals containing meat and vegetables or meat or vegetables; processed, canned, dried, preserved and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, fruit sauces, eggs, milk and milk beverages containing fruit juice, fruits and coffee; milk shakes, powdered milk for food purposes; soy milk; edible oils and fats | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Containers and cans, filled with coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from processed cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, namely; flavored fruit and confectionery ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces; spices; ice | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Containers and cans, filled with animal food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IMPRESS GROUP B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named EASY PEEL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |