USPTO serial 78525045
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CALABASAS, CA
Santa Ana, CA
Santa Ana, CA
Santa Ana, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig Fischer
Craig Fischer DTS LLC5220 Las Virgenes RoadLegal DepartmentCalabasas, CA 91302| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Stereo head units, namely, car head units, CD head units, DVD head units, Video Compact Disc head units, MP3 head units, single-DIN head units, double-DIN head units, in-dash CD, DVD, Video Compact Disc, and MP3 head units, in-dash CD, DVD, Video Compact Disc, and MP3 player head units, satellite radio head units and HD radio head units; In-dash car CD, DVD, Video Compact Disc, and MP3 car stereos; CD, DVD, Video Compact Disc, and MP3 decks; Digital media car players; Mobile multimedia monitor/control centers; Media control centers; Receivers, namely, digital audio receivers, CD receivers, in-dash CD, DVD, Video Compact Disc, and MP3 receivers and AM/FM receivers; Car audio systems, namely, car audio CD, DVD, Video Compact Disc, and MP3 players; Car audio players; CD, DVD, Video Compact Disc, and MP3 car stereos; Car audio players; CD, DVD, Video Compact Disc, and MP3 car stereos; Radio tuners; CD, DVD, Video Compact Disc, and MP3 Players; Amplifiers, namely, car power amplifiers and audio amplifiers; Digital preamplifiers; Amplifier processors; Amplifier Equalizers; Amplifier crossovers; Rear seat entertainment systems, namely, DVD, Video Compact Discs, CD, MP3, digital media players, and video display and audio playback players; Family entertainment systems, namely, DVD, Video Compact Disc, CD, MP3, digital media players, and video display and audio playback players; Rear seat video systems, namely, DVD, Video Compact Disc, CD, MP3, digital media players, and video display and audio playback players; Headrest display screens; Console entertainment systems, namely, multimedia playback systems which include DVD Video Compact Disc, CD, MP3, digital media and cassette players, navigation systems, video display and audio playback players, or radio receivers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 24, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 1, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |