Drawing for L-E-A-P

USPTO serial 78529980

L-E-A-P

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with L-E-A-P?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie A. Greenberg

JULIE A GREENBERG GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ET ALPO BOX 70212701 TROY CTR DR STE 330TROY, MI 48007-7021

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data processors which provide local environment audio processing in headsets, telephone headsets, cell phone headsets, headsets for use with computers and hands-free kits comprising microphones, earphones and headset adaptors sold as a unitACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 16, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 1, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Oct 3, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Oct 3, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Sep 15, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 13, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 13, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 14, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance