Drawing for THE SCIENCE OF SENSATION

USPTO serial 78532943

THE SCIENCE OF SENSATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SCIENCE OF SENSATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rosemary S. Tarlton

ROSEMARY S TARLTON MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Theater loudspeaker systems comprising main loudspeakers, surround loudspeakers, center loudspeakers, subwoofers, sound amplifiers and crossovers; home loudspeakers systems comprising main loudspeakers, surround loudspeakers, center loudspeakers, subwoofers, sound amplifiers and crossovers; televisions; sound amplifiers; stereo speakers; DVD players; CD players; speaker cables; projection screens; theater projection equipment, namely film projectors; automobile stereos; computer software and hardware for audio and audiovisual recording, display, and playback; video game discs; DVDs featuring audiovisual works; headphonesACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely providing training in the field of home theater sales and installationACTIVE—
042Testing of the goods and services of others for the purposes of certification in the fields of theater loudspeaker systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance