CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BFREE

USPTO serial 78534870

BFREE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BFREE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle L. Visser

MICHELLE L VISSER RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Baby bottles; cups adapted for feeding babies and infants; parts of baby bottles and cups adapted for feeding babies and infants, namely, non-spill valves for cups and baby bottles, spouts for cups and baby bottles, and handles for baby bottlesACTIVE—
021Feeding dishes adapted for use by babies and infants; baby bottle and teat cleaning brushesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 6, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 1, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 2, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 1, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 10, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 9, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 6, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 5, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 4, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 4, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 4, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 4, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance