Drawing for CHOICE REELS

USPTO serial 78537720

CHOICE REELS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DUBOIS, MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHOICE REELS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John D. Titus

John D. Titus DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC5009 E. Washington, Ste. 125Phoenix, AZ 85034UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal hand-operated reels for storing flexible hoseACTIVE
007Power-operated reels for storing flexible hoseACTIVE
020Non-metal hand-operated reels for storing flexible hoseACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 8, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 25, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Apr 6, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Mar 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 13, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 24, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 20, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance