USPTO serial 78537846
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jody H. Drake
JODY H DRAKE SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | GOODS OF COMMON METAL, NAMELY, SUPPORTS FOR USE WITH SHELVES, HINGES, BRACKETS, PLATES, ANGLE IRONS, BANDS OF METAL FOR TYPING PURPOSES, BARBED WIRE AND BASKETS, FITTINGS FOR BEDS, NAMELY, BELLS BINS, HOOKS, LATCHES; DOOR AND WINDOW FITTINGS MADE WHOLLY OR SUBSTANTIALLY OF METAL, NAMELY, HINGES,HANDLES, KNOBS, KNOCKERS, LATCHES, LOCKS, KEYS FOR LOCKS, KEY GUARDS; METAL DOOR KNOCKERS; IRONMONGERY AND SMALL ITEMS OF METAL HARDWARE, NAMELY, NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS, BARRELS, NAILS, LOCKS AND KEYS; METAL LETTER BOXES; METAL PLUMBING FITTINGS, NAMELY, PIPE FITTINGS, PIPES AND DUCTS FOR CENTRAL HEATING INSTALLATION; METAL DOORS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR; RAW METAL BUILDING PANELS, NAMELY, WALL PANELS, CEILING PANELS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | WOOD PANELING; BUILDING MATERIALS OF WOOD, NAMELY, WOOD JOINTS; PARQUET WOOD FLOORING; PARQUET WOOD FLOORBOARDS; NON-METAL FLOORING; WOOD PLANKS FOR BUILDING; RAW METAL BUILDING PANELS, NAMELY, FLOOR PANELS; VENEER WOOD FLOORS; NON-METAL DOORS, DOOR FRAMES, WINDOWS AND WINDOW FRAMES;WOOD VENEER; NON-METAL DOOR CASINGS; NON-METAL LATHS; AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | FURNITURE; SHELVES, SHELF UNITS, MIRRORS, PICTURE FRAMES; GOODS OF WOOD, NAMELY, PICTURE FRAME MOLDINGS, FURNITURE FRAMES, MIRROR FRAMES, BED FRAMES; LEAD CASKETS; AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |