USPTO serial 78540374
PAYPILOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAYPILOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bellingham, WA
Bellingham, WA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management and business consulting services, focusing on the control, tracking, processing and management of electronic commercial transactions, customer loyalty programs, customer identification, payment and reward transactions, and the use, application and development of computer systems, databases, software and hardware for the foregoing purposes | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | Rental and leasing of computer hardware; installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware, focusing on computer hardware for tracking and processing electronic commercial transactions, customer loyalty programs, customer identification and payment and reward transactions | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Rental and leasing of computer software; design, development, installation, maintenance of computer software, technical support, namely troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems and repair of computer software, focusing on computer software applications for tracking and processing electronic commercial transactions, customer loyalty programs, customer identification and payment and reward transactions; and application services provider services, namely hosting computer software applications of others focusing on computer hardware and computer software applications for tracking and processing electronic commercial transactions, customer loyalty programs, customer identification and payment and reward transactions | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2007 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |