USPTO serial 78548839
TRUCOURT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDGE, KATRINA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUCOURT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey J. Keck
JEFFREY J KECK JEFFREY KECK & ASSOCIATES301 E CALHOUN ST STE 200WOODSTOCK, IL 60098-4290UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Athletic track and game court surfaces, surface backings and floor matting, namely, multipurpose and specialty indoor and outdoor sports surfaces, surface backings and floor matting made from EPDM [Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer] synthetic rubber, other synthetic rubbers, natural rubber, and/or recycled rubber, in colors, and optionally in vulcanized layers, and/or with embossed or stamped finish | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Athletic track and game court surfaces, surface backings and floor matting, namely, multipurpose and specialty indoor and outdoor sports surfaces, surface backings and floor matting made from EPDM [Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer] synthetic rubber, other synthetic rubbers, natural rubber, and/or recycled rubber, in colors, and optionally in vulcanized layers, and/or with embossed or stamped finish | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |