USPTO serial 78550080
NYGÅRD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3979204Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 14, 2011
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NYGÅRD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nygard International Partnership
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Nygard International Partnership
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Nygard International Partnership
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Iris Hess
M. Iris Hess LADAS & PARRY LLP5670 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036-5679Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical eyewear, namely, eyeglasses and sunglasses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Small leather goods, namely, key cases, wallets and briefcase-type portfolios | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Women's clothing, namely, suits, blazers, vests, dress pants, sweaters, polo shirts, T-shirts, tank tops, dress shirts, casual shirts, jeans, casual pants, shorts, jackets, coats, swimwear, belts, hosiery, hats and gloves | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nygard International Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by Nygard International Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by Nygard International Partnership
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named NYGÅRD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 17, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 6, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |