USPTO serial 78550356
BOP-A-LOOPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOP-A-LOOPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tsim Sha Tsui, HK
Tsim Sha Tsui, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard R. Fine
Howard R. Fine Howard R. Fine, Attorney at Law2100 Sanders Road, Suite 200Northbrook, IL 60062UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game cartridges; Computer game discs; Computer game programs; Computer game software; Computer programs for pre-recorded games; Electronic game programs; Electronic game software for cellular telephones; Electronic game software for wireless devices; Electronic game software for handheld electronic devices; Interactive multimedia computer game program; Interactive video game programs; Video game cartridges; Video game discs; Video game machines for use with televisions; Video game software; Video output game machines for use with televisions | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Hand held unit for playing electronic games; hand held unit for playing video games; hand held games with liquid crystal displays; musical toys; parlor games; action skill games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |