USPTO serial 78551679
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SCHERING-PLOUGH ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATION
SUMMIT, NJ
Other trademarks owned by SCHERING-PLOUGH ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATION
SCHERING-PLOUGH ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATION
SUMMIT, NJ
Other trademarks owned by SCHERING-PLOUGH ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATION
Schering-Plough Veterinary Corporation
Summit, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Schering-Plough Veterinary Corporation
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel Wiener
CHARLES H OPPENHEIMER SCHERING CORP2000 GALLOPING HILL RDKENILWORTH, NJ 07033UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Health management program for cattle | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |