USPTO serial 78553569
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Shred-It Canada Corporation, Inc.
Oakville, CA
Shred-It Canada Corporation, Inc.
Oakville, CA
Shred-It Canada Corporation, Inc.
Oakville, CA
SECURIT RECORDS MANAGEMENT INC.
OAKVILLE, ONTARIO, CA
OAKVILLE, ONTARIO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard S. Michael
Howard S. Michael BRINKS GILSON & LIONEP.O. Box 10395Chicago, IL 60610UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Document management services, namely, document indexing and photocopying for others; facilities management services; document cataloguing and indexing for others; services of compilation and systemization of information into computer databases; collection of written communications and data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Electronic data storage and retrieval services; paper document and electronic document storage and retrieval services; storage and transportation of paper documents, papers records, and other forms of recorded media and data storage media on which documents and records are stored by means of truck; and electronic storage of other forms of recorded media and data storage media; providing secure facilities for storage of property, paper files, paper records and paper documents and other forms of recorded media and data storage media on which files, records and documents have been stored, to protect same from theft, fire, floods and other unintentional destruction | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Recycling of records, paper documents and other forms of recorded media and data storage media; removal of data and documents, namely, services of rendering data and documents unreadable or illegible by inserting software protection programs and security programs onto magnetic media and by shredding records, paper documents and other forms of recorded media and data storage media, including by use of a motor vehicle at or proximate customer premises equipped to render unreadable or illegible records, paper documents and other forms of recorded media and data storage media; document management services, namely, document scanning for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Retrieval services for computer data, namely, data collection services by using software to collect the data; data removal, namely, data conversion of computer program data or information; installation, maintenance and updating of computer software; computer systems analysis; electronic data conversion of computer programs and data; consultancy services relating to computer hardware and computer software; security services for the protection of electronic documents and data, namely, restricting access to electronically stored files and documents by means of electronic firewalls and password protection; data searching services, namely, providing specific information as requested by customers via the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 17, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 14, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 7, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 27, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |