Drawing for ANGELI

USPTO serial 78555870

ANGELI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANGELI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIE B. SEYLER

JULIE B. SEYLER ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry and costume jewelry, namely, rings, bracelets, necklaces, tie-bars, scarf rings, pendants, ear clips, tie clips, cufflinks, earrings, key holders made of precious metals, brooches, and pins; clocks, watches, chronographs for use as watches, chronometersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 30, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 13, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 1, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2007GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 13, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 7, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 5, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 26, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance