USPTO serial 78555870
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIE B. SEYLER
JULIE B. SEYLER ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry and costume jewelry, namely, rings, bracelets, necklaces, tie-bars, scarf rings, pendants, ear clips, tie clips, cufflinks, earrings, key holders made of precious metals, brooches, and pins; clocks, watches, chronographs for use as watches, chronometers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |