USPTO serial 78561033
MTX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3746850Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 9, 2010
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MTX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary L. Shapiro
Mary L. Shapiro Evoke Law, PC244 California Street, Suite 507San Francisco, CA 94111-4354UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing apparatus and instruments, namely, graphics and multi-media processors, computer hardware; integrated circuits; integrated circuit cards, cores, and modules for incorporation into microchips, all for sale to manufacturers of multi-media and communication devices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design and development of data processing hardware and software, computer hardware and software, and of integrated circuits for others; design of integrated circuits and parts of integrated circuits for others, or for incorporation into microchips | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Imagination Technologies Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Imagination Technologies Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Imagination Technologies Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MTX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 8, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |