USPTO serial 78563770
ECOLOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3473667Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2008
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECOLOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VANERSBORG, SE
RINGFEDER POWER-TRANSMISSION GMBH
D-47807 KREFELD, DE
RINGFEDER POWER-TRANSMISSION GMBH
D-47807 KREFELD, DE
Krefeld, DE
Krefeld, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Josh A. Partington
Josh A. Partington Harness, Dickey & Pierce PLC11730 Plaza America Dr. #600Reston, VA 20190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER TRANSMISSION COMPONENTS/ACCESSORIES, NOT FOR LAND VEHICLES, NAMELY, CLAMPING CONNECTIONS FOR SHAFTS AND HUBS AND PERTAINING CLAMPING MEANS, NAMELY, PRESSURE FLANGES AND SHRINK DISCS MADE OF METAL; POWER TRANSMISSION COMPONENTS/ACCESSORIES, NOT FOR LAND VEHICLES, NAMELY, METAL CLAMPS, DAMPERS AND SHAFT COUPLINGS FOR INTERCONNECTING SHAFTS, AXLES, OR PIPES; MACHINES AND MACHINE PARTS FOR METAL PROCESSING, NAMELY, BROACHING MACHINES, INJECTION PLASTIC MOLDING MACHINES AND CALCINING MACHINES FOR CHEMICAL PROCESSING AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFORE FOR ALL; AGRICULTURAL MACHINES, NAMELY, CULTIVATORS, HARVESTERS, DISK HARROWS, SEEDERS; PARTS FOR MINING MACHINE MINING, NAMELY, BITS FOR MINING MACHINES; TEXTILE MACHINERY, NAMELY, SPRAY DAMPING MACHINES; PACKAGING MACHINES; CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION MACHINES; TOOL MACHINES, NAMELY, TOOL GRINDING MACHINES; MOTORS FOR MACHINES AND VEHICLES OTHER THAN LAND VEHICLES; POWER TRANSMISSIONS AND GEARING FOR MACHINES NOT BEING FOR LAND VEHICLES; CLAMPING BUSHINGS AS MACHINE PARTS AND AS PARTS OF POWER TRANSMISSIONS AND GEARING, NOT FOR LAND VEHICLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 8, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VBG GROUP AB
- Other trademarks owned by RINGFEDER POWER-TRANSMISSION GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by RINGFEDER POWER-TRANSMISSION GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Ringfeder VBG GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Ringfeder VBG GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named ECOLOC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 29, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |