Drawing for THE LEGENDS

USPTO serial 78565822

THE LEGENDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LEGENDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALBERT T KEYACK

ROBERT A. MCKINLEY, ESQ. KLEHR HARRISON HARVEY BRANZBURG & ELLERS, LLP260 S. BROAD STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wine from CaliforniaACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Dec 7, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 26, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS
Mar 26, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Mar 26, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Mar 5, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 18, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 5, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Feb 22, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 13, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 13, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 15, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 9, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 8, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance