Drawing for READERWARE

USPTO serial 78569055

READERWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with READERWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori M. Stockton

LORI M STOCKTON BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Identification and inventory integrated circuits which use radio frequency to communicate information to computers and other electronic devices; integrated circuits in the form of straps, inlays, tags and labels which use radio frequency to communicate information to computers and other electronic devices; integrate circuits; magnetically coded radio frequency card readers; antennas; radio transmitters; radio receivers and micro-processors; digital signal processors; data processors; computer memories; electronic memories; semi-conductor memories; electronic sensors for detecting radio frequency waves; computer hardware; computer software for transmitting, receiving and processing information sent via radio frequency; computer peripheralsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Apr 10, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 7, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jan 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 13, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 6, 2006LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED
Dec 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 14, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 11, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 7, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 13, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance