USPTO serial 78569246
URAC PROMOTING QUALITY HEALTH CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3308393Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 2007
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with URAC PROMOTING QUALITY HEALTH CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip D. Mitchell
PHILIP D. MITCHELL EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN PC250 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-0077UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Accreditation and certification services, namely, analysis and evaluation of the quality and efficiency of managed health care plans for the purpose of accreditation and certification | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | ISIR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |