Drawing for RUSSIAN ICE

USPTO serial 78572437

RUSSIAN ICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUSSIAN ICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John R. Lane

JOHN R LANE FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151-0099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry and watchesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 14, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 29, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jan 15, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 20, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Aug 20, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jul 13, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 13, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 6, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 27, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 26, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance