USPTO serial 78573604
ROBERT RODRIGUEZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROBERT RODRIGUEZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell E. Radin
Mitchell E. Radin Cowan, DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard, LLP41 Madison Avenue34th FloorNew York, NY 10010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and skin care products, namely, skin and face cremes, face and body oils, skin and facial moisturizers, skin and facial toners, skin and facial lotions, foundations, face and body powders, nail polishes, lipsticks, eye pencils, eye shadows, mascaras, rouges, blushes, lip balms, hair shampoos, hair conditioners, face and skin soaps, bath gels, bath oils, non-medicated bath salts, perfume, eau de toilette, scented body sprays | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Eyewear, namely sunglasses and sunglass cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Purses, wallets, attaché cases, handbags, evening bags, tote bags, and umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pantsuits, jumpsuits; coordinates, namely skirt and vest sets, skirt and sweater sets, skirt and blouse sets, skirt and jacket sets, pants and vest sets, pants and shirt sets, pants and blouse sets, pants and jacket sets, overall and blouse sets, overall and T-shirts sets, overall and sweater sets; outerwear, namely parkas, wind-proof jackets, fleece jackets, anoraks and raincoats; tops, namely sweatshirts, fleece tops, bodysuits; bottoms, namely overalls, jeans, sweatpants; underwear, namely brassieres, panties, slips, camisoles, bodysuits, unitards; sleepwear, loungewear and lingerie, namely pajamas, nightgowns, bathrobes, and dressing gowns; swimwear, namely bathing suits and cover-ups; hosiery, namely tights, leotards, socks and stockings; headwear, namely visors, caps, hats, head bands and earmuffs; sportswear, namely track suits, sweatsuits, sweatshirts, sweatpants, jogging suits, warmup pants, warmup shirts, warmup suits, armbands; footwear, namely boots, shoes, slippers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Moda Nicola International LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Moda Nicola International LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ROBERT RODRIGUEZ
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |