USPTO serial 78575390
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $3,900
CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA
SPECIALTY PRODUCTS OF GREENWOOD, MISSOURI, INC.
Greenwood, MO
Other trademarks owned by SPECIALTY PRODUCTS OF GREENWOOD, MISSOURI, INC.
SPECIALTY PRODUCTS OF GREENWOOD, MISSOURI, INC.
Greenwood, MO
Other trademarks owned by SPECIALTY PRODUCTS OF GREENWOOD, MISSOURI, INC.
SPECIALTY PRODUCTS OF GREENWOOD, MISSOURI, INC.
Greenwood, MO
Other trademarks owned by SPECIALTY PRODUCTS OF GREENWOOD, MISSOURI, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew G. Colombo
Andrew G. Colombo HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 1000Overland Park, KS 66210UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Extension poles of metal; extension poles primarily of metal for use in painting and window washing; and metal coupling assemblies and adapters for attaching tools to extension poles | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2005 |
| 008 | Extension poles for hand tools; extension poles for use in changing light bulbs; extension poles and threaded adapters sold as a unit and used in connection with hand tools; hand tools for cleaning and treating marine vessels and equipment, namely, a flow-through extension pole with a scrub brush and an extension pole with a treating applicator roller | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2005 |
| 016 | Extension poles and threaded adapters sold as a unit and used in connection with paint applicators; painting equipment, namely, telescopic extension poles, extension handles, paint roller grids, paint rollers, paint edgers, pad painters, paint wands, replacement paint pads, paint roller frames, paint rollers each having a telescoping extension pole or extension handle, corner paint applicators, sash paint applicators, and rollers and handles for corner and sash paint applicators | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2005 |
| 017 | Water flow-through extension handles and extension poles for use with garden hoses; kit for constructing a temporary airborne debris barrier or wall, consisting primarily of plastic sheeting, a plurality of extendable poles and a plurality of heads connectable to the poles and configured to secure the sheeting adjacent a ceiling | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Plastic fittings for extension poles, namely, a threaded end piece to permit connection of the pole with a tool | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2006 |
| 021 | Kit containing items for use in washing windows, namely a squeegee, squeegee blades, sleeve and sleeve support; extension poles, threaded adaptors and squeegees sold as a unit and used in connection with window washing tools; sleeve-shaped sponges for washing windows; squeegees; squeegees and extension poles sold as a unit; water flow-through extension handles and extension poles for use with garden hoses, each having a brush for scrubbing | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 7, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 7, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |