Drawing for HEART HERITAGE

USPTO serial 78575408

HEART HERITAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEART HERITAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jane Pinzow-Naidoff, Esq.

Jane Pinzow-Naidoff, Esq. WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LL399 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed materials, namely brochures, newsletters, bulletins and education materials for the treatment of heart diseaseACTIVE
041Providing seminars, conferences and instructional classes featuring information regarding health care and pharmaceutical products and servicesACTIVE
044Providing medical information in the field of health care and pharmaceutical products and services; providing a website at which users can obtain medical information regarding health care and pharmaceutical products and servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 15, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 17, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 18, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Apr 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance