USPTO serial 78575417
LOTR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOTR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carole F. Barrett
Carole F. Barrett Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & RabkinThree Embarcadero Center, 7th FloorSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for the transmission of messages among computer users concerning computer games, films and dramatic performances | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting programs in the field of fantasy; providing training in the field of playing online computer games; entertainment services, namely, conducting parties; organizing exhibitions for display of film and theatrical memorabilia; amusement parks; arranging for ticket reservations for shows and other entertainment events; entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, namely, musical band, rock group, gymnastic, dance and ballet performances; booking of seats for shows and booking of theatre tickets; direction or presentation of plays; presentation of live show performances; presentation of musical performances; entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of a game show via a global computer network; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, music, fantasy film clips, and other multi-media materials; fan club services; on-line programming services; presentation of musical performances; planning arrangement of showing movies, shows, musical performances and plays; presentation of live show performances; entertainment, namely, production of plays; entertainment in the nature of theatre productions; providing a web site featuring photographs; providing a web site featuring games and information about personalities, animation, trivia, movies, animated cartoons, and news and information about the entertainment industry and associated entertainment topics; providing articles and commentary about dramatic and theatrical performances, fantasy films, music and musicals via a global computer network; providing a computer game that may be accessed network-wide by network users; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games and on-line multi-user game matching services; providing information about artwork and animated cartoons via a global computer network; providing news and information in the field of entertainment relating to computer and video games and computer and video game software via a global computer network; providing pre-recorded music via a global computer network; providing facilities for recreation facilities; providing facilities for showing movies; production and distribution of motion pictures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |